@ltleflrt replied to your post “@unforth-ninawaters replied to your post:
Upon…”
These are basically my complaints about a lot of a/b/o tbh.
Yeah, I can see that. Especially the social commentary and the under and over explaining.
One thing I always think about is like… if alphas and omegas developed a relatively long time ago in human evolution, why are male and female still the primary sex designations? I would think, even though they show up later in life (for the most part) that the stuff that determines whether your primary role in reproduction is to impregnate or be impregnated would be the more important stuff.
Another thing… male omegas are always kind of lumped in with all other omegas, which makes sense but I always wonder like… depending on when the A/B/O stuff was introduced to human society, there’s a possibility that male omegas might be seen as the best thing in the world, right? Wouldn’t there be some cultures where being a male omega or a female alpha would land you a lot of social status? Or at least a special social class with some dignity and respect? What kind of inequality exists between male omegas and female omegas? (Because you know there’s gotta be some, right?)
Ugh I’m rambling again. But yeah, the thing about A/B/O is that it’s ripe with opportunity to explore social dynamics and structure and even alternate history, but a lot of it is copy/paste hot button issues.