Made up fic title: Witching Hour

I’ve written a few lighter witch AUs recently so I think I’m gonna go darker with this one. 

Setting: New England forest. Vague time period but definitely not the 21st century. 

Rey runs away from home and her abusive uncle and gets lost in the woods. She’s cold, starving, and frightened when she runs across what looks like and abandoned bonfire. The coals are still hot so she gathers up some nearby kindling and a few logs and starts herself a small fine. Suddenly, from the shadows, a man approaches. She’s terrified but all he does is talk to her. He knows a lot about her, apparently, and it’s unnerving. Still, she can’t help but feel compelled to listen and to speak when he asks her questions. She finds herself pouring out her life story before she can stop herself. He offers her a deal; she’ll find her way out of the woods, and she’ll never be at the mercy of any human being ever again. She’ll never be powerless ever again. All he asks of her is a single kiss. It’s odd, but she accepts. 

Rey then wakes up just outside the woods and things start to get… weird. Things she’s wanted but never dared hope for just start to happen. Her uncle drops dead and leaves the house to her. A great job practically falls in her lap. Other people just sort of bend to her will. It’s odd, but it’s kind of nice! At least, until that shadowy man shows up again and starts making demands. 

Maybe she should’ve been more wary before charging off into the woods, before burning god knows what over an open flame, before kissing a strange man in the middle of the night. Maybe then she wouldn’t be in service to the devil himself. 

Send me a title, I’ll tell you what I’d write!

image
image

@tinkdw 

Wow. Okay. I’ll be honest with you, I was expecting something… more veiled I suppose but whatever. I’ll break this down… again. 

Putting that quote back in context, I said: 

The misogynistic undercurrent comes in when we use Twilight (and 50 Shades) as the height of “crap I don’t want young women to read”. And of course I have to ask why? Why shouldn’t teen girls read it? It’s not well written, sure, but that’s not the reason most folks give. The reason most folks give is that it’s bad for them somehow, that reading Twilight is somehow damaging. Again, why? Because teen girls are impressionable and will think this is the kind of relationship they should be striving for? Can’t they understand the difference between a romantic fantasy that means nothing, one where they can live vicariously through a fictional character and date the bad body without actually ever being in any danger of anything more than a paper cut?

And you respond by blaming dating violence on fiction. And to be honest, this really, really pissed me off. I don’t know if you’re aware how much responsibility you’re putting on stories here, but it’s a lot. You’re placing blame on fiction when the blame for any and all abuse in relationships should be on the abusers. I’m very sympathetic to your friends and I hate that they were ever abused, but it wasn’t because of stories, it was because their partners were dicks. Their partners made the choices to be abusive. 

Look, perhaps I made a mistake by using the term “critical thinking” when I really meant “the ability to differentiate between fiction and the real world” I’m not asking teenage girls to sit down and write an essay about every book they read, but I am saying that most teenagers know the difference real and not real and that the hopeful optimism in things like “happily ever after” and those kinds of romantic notions have more to do with the idealism and optimism of youth than they do with the kinds of stories we tell. Art is reflective. It can seek to change the world we’re living in, but for the most part it reflects something about the world. We write about our hopes, our fears, our wants, our dreams, and our worries. We write about what the world is and what we fear or wish it could be. This is the reason fantasy exists. We want to slay dragons and save the day. We want happily ever afters. We want to have some kind of power in our own lives, especially when we have none. 

And I have to ask, why do you think certain stories appeal to certain kinds of people? Why would teenage girls especially be drawn to love stories where bad boys have soft centers and desire them wholly? Why would a teenage girl want a story where she’s special and important and has power over men? Well, I’d say a lot of it has to do with the fact that young women have very little power in the real world. In fiction they can explore a power fantasy they don’t have access to in real life. 

I know I’m probably not going to change your mind, and that’s okay. You can say you want better stories for teen girls and that’s fine, but what I’m saying is I really don’t think there’s that much harm in young women reading their “trashy” teen romances. You said yourself that as a teen you loved Angel/Buffy, and while I don’t know much about Buffy at all I do know that you yourself put it in the “power imbalance”/bad category in your original post. I’m going to go out on a limb and assume that even as a teen you knew it wasn’t perfect, but there was something about it you loved. It spoke to something inside you, and it made you happy. So I have to ask you here, what makes you so special? What makes you different from all the other girls who loved that relationship or relationship like it that grew up well adjusted and able to understand that things that are okay in books aren’t always okay in real life? I’m not asking them to “ignore” things. I’m asking them to think about things. I believe they can. I believe they do. I believe we’ll get better at is as time goes on. Education goes a lot with it, because even if every teen romance ever written from now on was a shining example of real love (which… I’m not ever going to get into that) there would still be dating violence. Cruel people will always be cruel, but the key is recognizing the behavior for what it is and helping those who need help.

Now, of course I’m saying we should be critical of media. I’ve said that several times. But I actually do think young women are smart enough to do it. I was a teenager when Twilight came out. I was one of those teenage girls who used to get in fights with other girls to tell them what they were reading was trash. I was one of those girls who cited all those articles and think-pieces about how bad Twilight was. I’m deeply ashamed of that now, because I was an ass. I shouldn’t’ve been out there moralizing about how terrible it was. My peers understood it was just a story. They loved it for their own reasons, but I was the jackass who didn’t trust their judgment. I was wrong. But the fact was that when Twilight was a thing (ten years ago) the environment around it was such that plenty of people were telling teen girls the relationship wasn’t ideal, to the point of bashing. Teen girls were educated on the issues with that series whether they wanted to be or not. 

As to the larger conversation about the messages we send in media, I do feel there are harmful messages sent to all people. I’m not saying there aren’t. What I am saying is that we’re too hard on things like teen romance. Media isn’t the only thing that affects who we are and how we behave, and I would wager that a lot of the harmful things we’re taught aren’t taught through television or books, but through parents, teachers, and guardians. “He picks on you because he likes you” was told to me by my own mother. The conversation about bad messaging is complex, and as I stated before I refuse to lay it all at the feet of art. There are dozens of factors. And I also don’t agree that the majority of love stories aimed at teen girls are in the same vein as Twilight. 

And to the thing about boys, what I was saying is that no one talks about how terrible it is for boys to read books like say… Ender’s Game. No one talks about how damaging and dangerous it is for boys to read about someone who is essentially a child solider who destroys entire worlds. That’s what I meant. No one expects boys to become Ender because they read about him. We also don’t expect young women to become Katniss and kill kids and topple governments. I know these are different genres, but that’s my point. My issue is that we hold romance to a higher standard when it’s just as fantastical as any other genre. 

But I will tell you what I think is unfair and unreasonable: assuming that young woman can’t think about the media they consume. It’s unfair and unreasonable to hold books written by women, for women to a standard we don’t hold for books written by men, for men. It’s unfair and unreasonable to blame stories for the actions for real people. It’s unfair and unreasonable to hold girls to a different standard and to moralize about their tastes. 

Have you noticed a trend or a pattern like certain ships or ship dynamics attracting certain kinds of people? Im not trying to start wank. Im curious bc ALL my rl friends ship my notps like Bill & Sookie over Eric & Sookie. Bangel over Spuffy. Bibro over destiel. And since I have emotional/mental problems, i worry its me bc Im drawn to or I romanticize dysfunctional unhealthy relationships. (Btw my fave Spuffy argument is how Angelus and Spike viewed their souls. A curse vs atonement)

tinkdw:

Hi 🙂

Firstly I want to say please don’t worry about things you like! If you like it you like it, unless it’s causing you or someone else harm it’s all good 🙂

Yes I have noticed a link, I’ve been discussing it recently actually with friends, how there seems to (generally not always but generally) be a Bangel/Sookie x Bill/Wincest divide v Spuffy/Sookie x Eric/Destiel in shippers.

It comes down to why you like things I guess and it does totally make sense to like either an obvious 

1.Bangel/Sookie x Bill/Wincest: “first love” or just… first on screen, kind of thing that is quite soulmate-y and including a power imbalance, a kind of “save me prince charming” thing, dark and exciting to watch, the word I hate passionate where what it really means is emotionally abusive and even quite depreciative, with an element of one (usually the woman) being young, naive and wide eyed (the kind of thing that often is pushed on teenage stories because “teenage girls love this” well yeah cos it’s all we got when I was a teen and urgh no more thank you! I’m looking at you Twilight/50 shades! I don’t want this for my teenage girl if I have one!).

versus 

2. Spuffy/Sookie x Eric/Destiel: something that is much more long term in coming, takes shape over time, is deep in the narrative, ends up being really quite healthy in terms of real life comparisons with a more equal power balance, making the “male figure” far more soft and giving the “female figure” more power in a het relationship and in a same sex still with a similar meeting in the middle concept, giving them more agency in the relationship (especially the woman when it’s het as usually she’s younger and in awe of the first boyfriend but older and more world wise by the time it comes to the second), giving her far more choice in the matter, totally not soulmate-y at all but about them growing up.

This is just a random person opinion, based on what I’ve seen. Though I have spoken to people where we discussed the way Buffy/Angel as shows finished around the time SPN started and how the exact same online dialogue and terms – eg “delusional”, “unhealthy”, “pandering” “the show is going to shit” – started coming about in SPN fandom and clearly were the same people who were just as vile about SPN as they were Buffy/Angel so I do think there is a clear link as well as the one I had already noted psychologically:

https://tinkdw.tumblr.com/post/171169423912/rahirah-tesla1321-tinkdw-i-wonder-if-the

 Ooookay there’s a lot to unpack here. @tinkdw if you’d like to have a conversation about this in a more private way, I’m all for it. Please don’t think that I’m attacking you, because I’m not. I just have a lot of issues with this line of thought because I think there’s a lot more going on here than just “power imbalance” vs “power balance”. I think that’s quite reductive and since I’ve been involved with fandom the concept of shipping, why people ship what they do, and how they ship things has fascinated me. I’ve been drawn to understand it and the shippers who enjoy it. So, please allow me to discuss what I’ve found through talking to folks and reading their works and headcanons. 

First of all, yes, different people are drawn to different dynamics and relationships. What “does it” in terms of satisfying drama is different for everyone. Some folks love soft and fluffy pairings with minimum angst, other people love love/hate, slap-slap-kiss relationships. There’s also an element of relatability to characters that plays in to why people ship what they do. If someone is more interested in one or two characters they’re more likely to ship them together, especially if the dynamic is one that interests them. 

Every ship that has ever existed has some kind of core “essence” if you will. It’s a theme that runs through nearly every AU and canon fic that these characters appear in and often is the very thing that draws people in. For something like destiel it seems like “meeting in the middle” and “star-crossed lovers” fit pretty well. (I mean, look at how many human/creature aus there are. Hell, the ship itself is human/immortal creature.) That’s fun for some folks. Wincest is more “ride-or-die, ‘til the end of the line” “Us against the world” “I don’t want to live without you” and that just does “it” for some folks. The social taboo might also play into shipping, either as a “sure whatever I don’t care” factor or a “this is wrong and I like that” factor. I could get into the psychology of taboos but I’m not really wanting to right now. All I will say is that this taboo isn’t limited to one ship, nor is it limited to fandom. Some people enjoy the fantasy of it, and that doesn’t mean they’re out there wanting to sleep with their own family anymore than liking professor/student fic makes you want to have sex with your professors or students. It’s fantasy. 

Second, there is no one reason people ship things. For some folks, they go off what they believe is or will be canon. Others like to play around with dynamics. Still others use fictional relationships as coping methods for real life trauma. I’ve met plenty of folks who are survivors of all manner of awful things who ship wincest. I haven’t met anyone yet who wants wincest to be A Thing on the show. A large number of people just ship things. They don’t really have a rhyme or reason as to why, they just do. Something has drawn them in and they want to play around with the characters. It’s not like most people sit around asking themselves “Why do I ship this? What does it say about me? What draws me to this?” …. I mean, I do but I’m a huge analytical nerd. 

No, I’d say that there’s just some kind of “spark” in a ship for some folks. Sure, you can find patterns in the things people like to ship (I love angsty ships. Gimme battle couples, star-crossed lovers, and big, epic love stories any day.) but it doesn’t necessarily reflect what they actually want IRL. To address the anon, liking certain ships doesn’t mean you’re going to want to or try to emulate them, even with mental illness. It’s not a reflection on the kind of person you are anymore than liking gore-fest horror movies is. There’s nothing wrong with having a preference and there’s nothing wrong with liking unhealthy relationships in fiction. 

Lastly, I’m gonna go to bat for Twilight here a bit. Can we please stop slamming 50 Shades and Twilight as if they’re the worst thing a teenage girl or young woman can read or enjoy? Please? Look, the trope of shitty dudes being changed by the women they love isn’t new. It’s old as hell and most often comes up in literature written by women, for women. It’s a power fantasy, the same as something like killing the dragon and getting the girl is a male power fantasy. Is it realistic or desirable in real life? Hell, no, but being the Chosen One and toppling an authoritarian regime single-handed isn’t really either, if we’re being realistic. The thread of thinking that really bothers me here is the idea that it’s bad for teenage girls, frankly, because they’re too dumb to realize that it’s fiction and shouldn’t be something they want in real life. That really bothers me. Teenage girls aren’t stupid. They might very well feel that things in Twilight are romantic, especially when they’re written to be romantic by the author, but I have more faith in teenagers to understand the difference between fiction and reality. This idea that women (especially young women) are too fragile or weak-minded to process fiction is old and it’s dumb. 

I know I’m on a tangent now, but I really need to say that I dislike the undercurrent of misogyny that sits inside the bashing of things like Twilight. Sure, it’s mass media and we ought to be critical of it, but that doesn’t mean it should get blamed for all ills and for “sending a bad message”. Look, I was a teenager when it came out. I hate it on principle. I thought I was so much smarter than my peers b/c I didn’t like it. I “wasn’t like other girls” b/c I didn’t like the trashy teen romance. Yet I was the one who wound up in an abusive relationship because of my own lack of self-worth and some shitty dude who took advantage of that. Fiction didn’t do that, some asshole did. And no, I’m not saying we can’t be critical of things. We should. But being critical doesn’t mean “this is just trash and it’s and it’s bad for you”. Being critical involves looking at the media and discussing the issues as well as the value it may hold. Critical thinking doesn’t go out the window when we read fiction, but it also doesn’t mean that we can’t seriously enjoy things that aren’t great in the “morals and values” department. If we really worry about teenage girls and how they value themselves in and outside of relationships, I say we focus more on educating them about good, healthy relationships and encouraging them to built self-esteem. We can change our media, too, but Twilight and 50 Shades weren’t the start or the end of these kinds of stories. They’re always going to exist because people enjoy them, and shame does no one any good.

Wrapping it all back up for my final point: people are drawn to different things for different reasons. We can analyze why a story that involves all-encompassing, fated-to-be story might draw folks in but that doesn’t make it better than a story about two people who come together despite that. Shipping is about love and sexuality and compassion and companionship. There are thousands of stories to tell there and none of them are really “better” or “worse” they’re just different. They speak to people for different reasons. It’s never really so black and white. It’s personal preference. What appeals to one person is a NOTP for someone else. There’s themes in ships and fiction that people enjoy, but I think the best way to figure out what it is that draws certain people do those things is to talk to them.

paininthecasbutt:

apersnicketylemon:

livinginthequestion:

apersnicketylemon:

apersnicketylemon:

Pedophilia is bad should not be a radical statement.

No really, please reblog this if you can, because this site in general, but fandom spaces especially bad for this, to the point where people are genuinely afraid of harassment they may face for saying ‘Pedophilia is a bad thing and you probably should not encourage it’ or for calling it what it is. Fandom spaces are also especially bad for screaming about how it’s ‘just fiction’ when we know damn well that fiction impacts reality.

Actual, real-life pedophilia is bad. People dealing with their personal pain by writing about it, in a fictional setting where tags and opt-in measures allow others to avoid it, are fine; in fact, a very effective way of working through one’s issues. Oversimplifying the process from ‘pedophilia is bad’ to ‘all people who write fiction about it are bad’ is policing in its worst form. 

Actually, trauma survivor here,  these people are in fact still furthering the normalization of the trauma they are working through, while also actively hurting other survivors!

If you feel the need to write it to process it, I understand that completely. In fact I’ve DONE that as a part of processing my own trauma in the past! However, you do not get to publish it into public spheres, including online, where all it will do is hurt other people. Likewise, this form of trauma processing is not, in fact, helping you!

These people include other survivors who may have been trying to avoid it and were unable to, people who are being groomed for abuse, people who are already being abused, and do not recognize that abuse for what it is, and the person writing it (assuming they ARE in fact a trauma survivor, because the vast majority of the people shipping siblings, minor/adult relations, and other abuses, are not in fact survivors of this. They just get their jollies off to it!).

Likewise, this is not, in fact, a coping mechanism, and it is not fine. This is retraumatization and self harm in many cases, being written off as ‘coping’. When you publish that, particularly the people who are writing it as ‘romance’, you hurt other survivors. In fact it’s predominantly survivors calling this shit out.

When you have a dozen people telling you ‘if you need to process it through these means, you cannot publish it because this is normalizing it and hurting all of us and people who will be hurt by it’, then you need to recognize that what you are doing is hurting someone and then saying “I’M JUST COPING!!!” which makes you an abusive piece of shit.

Now, consider the fact that you essentially just said “pedophilia is bad BUT FICTION IS OKAY!! FICTIONAL PEDOPHILIA IS ALWAYS FINE AND EFFECTIVE FOR HELPING PEOPLE SO YOU CAN’T CALL ANYONE OUT ON IT EVER!! YOU’RE POLICING COPING!!!”

Like, no. Most of those people writing hebdophilia, abuse, incest, and pedophilia fics on AO3 in some fandoms are NOT coping with a goddamned thing and pretending they are and saying ‘buuuuut fictional pedophilia/hebdophilia/abuse should never be policed!!’ is only going to create MORE victims. (like, I am in one of these fandoms. The people shipping the 25year old with the 14-17 year olds are not ‘coping’, they are fetishizing. Their argument is not ‘It’s my coping mechanism’ it’s ‘but it’s just fiction!!’).

And yes, coping SHOULD be policed. If you are hurting others, normalizing abuse, and retraumatizing/hurting yourself, it’s a bad way to cope, and isn’t coping but self harm, and you need to let it go and find something healthier. You should be helped through this process, definitely, but you should also be working on it, particularly if your ‘coping’ is being read by actual pedophiles, attracting them to your work.

Yes, changing how you cope can be hard, but it is hardly impossible, and acting like people using these things to cope should be allowed to without ever being challenged in that is actively preventing their recovery too. It was when I gave up self harming and found better ways to deal with stress (baking, video games, a long bath, a bad movie, a favourite comedy show) that I began to heal and recover.

I was hardly perfect, it was hard work, but if you actually care about survivors you should consider listening to us when we say that what you’re talking about still hurts us, doesn’t help us work through our trauma, and is not being primarily produced for or by us and therefore continues the normalization of the abuses we faced while failing to display healthy relationships and thus draws in more future victims who do not know the difference between ‘healthy’ and ‘abusive’ due to the excessive normalization both in fanfiction and in published fiction and other media, and society at large encouraging hebdophilia already especially.

Also listen to us when we say we are tired of our abuse being fetishized for the consumption of others, particularly by people who are writing/drawing it and have never been in that situation themselves, and they and their readers ignoring us saying these things. As these people are often also fetishizing mlm and wlw relationships we’re especially tired that they are portraying us as hebdophiles and pedophiles when we’re already accused of this by the outside world too.

@rosemoonweaver what do you think about this?

I’ll tell you what I think.

First, I think that unless you’re a licensed mental health professional you have no business telling anyone how bad their therapist approved coping methods are. I’ll get into why I think that’s so insidious in a little bit.

Second, I think that you can write absolutely anything fictional AND publish it no matter how vile or disturbing the content is.

Third, I think our lemon friend here is slippery and has gone from “this thing we all agree is bad is bad” to “all these things that make me uncomfortable are bad and don’t you dare publish them ever”. And I think that is really harmful.

Alright. Let me break this down a little more and refute some shit.

First of all, the mental health thing. How dare you? How dare you tell people who are survivors just trying to get by that the coping methods they’ve found or have been offered to them by a therapist are bad for them. Do you have any proof that this coping method literally helps no one? I mean actual studies and research, not individual testimony. No? Didn’t think so, because it’s not true. This is argumentum ad populum. If a bunch of people say it, it must be true! No, no it’s not. A bunch of people say that the earth is flat and that’s bullshit, too.

Here’s the thing – writing about trauma is hard. It’s painful. It kinda sucks sometimes. Last year I wrote the aftermath of a car wreck and I had to keep getting up and walking around my kitchen because even though it was very brief and not very detailed, it struck a nerve. It was tough to do, but you know what? I felt better after I did it. I was able to process my own feelings a little better, and in the end, I was proud of myself for doing it. But here’s the thing, you say that we’re not allowed to share that with other people and I have to ask why. When I first talked to my therapist about writing my pain out (she suggested it, by the way) she wanted me to share it when I finished. She wanted me to either share it with her or in a small group or even online because a very important part of the process for me is to be heard. I need people to hear me. I need people to believe me. I need, after years of being gaslighted and hiding away in the corners of my own mind, for people to witness me. And a great way to do that is to share the work I’ve written, in a way that makes me comfortable, in a place where there are safeguards so that others who might not want to see it don’t have to. For me, that means content warnings all over the place and posting under a cut if we’re talking tumblr.

And you know, the idea that work that deals with sensitive topics can only hurt people is false anyway. I’ve been triggered by some fiction. It was properly tagged but I read it anyway, thinking I was in an okay state of mind but I wasn’t and it brought up some icky intrusive memories. And, you know, that sucked. I lost a lot of sleep over that and had myself a panic attack. But you know what? I survived. I had tools at my disposal to calm down, to center myself, and to relax. But I’m not mad at the author for writing that stuff. I’m not mad at them for sharing it, either. I’m mad at the person who did the things that caused me to be traumatized. And, you know, I have hope that they way the particular topic that triggered me was addressed might’ve helped someone. The whole scene that freaked me out was a character realizing they’d been abused and if that helps just one person understand what happened to them wasn’t okay, I’m over the moon happy for it. I’ve had lots of friends (all who write darkfic) tell me that they’ve had comments from people who thank them for allowing them to understand what happened to them and how it wasn’t okay. Hell, I personally have learned what the hell gaslighting looks like because of fanfic and that’s helped me understand how it was done to me!

And I know, the examples I gave were car crash related and not CSA but you know what? The attitude and impression you give off isn’t good for survivors. I don’t have to share anymore than I already have about the shit I’ve been through or the crap other people have done to me, so I won’t. I don’t want to use my abuse as some kind of instant credentials. Darkfic (aka cope shipping) can help a lot of people. It doesn’t help everyone, though, and you know what, that’s okay too! A little too much dark stuff can be bad for people (like me) and it’s about knowing your limits and knowing when to take a step back and when to not engage. But, I’m sorry, I really really hate the idea that cope shipping or writing darkfic or writing The Bad Thing is somehow bad in and of itself. It breeds a deep shame in people, one I’ve had to beat back with a stick so that I’m okay with expressing myself to people who will actually care. I don’t want survivors to feel like writing about their abuse in a fictionalized way is a bad thing. I don’t want survivors to feel guilty about sharing their experiences with others, no matter how they chose to do it. We deal with enough guilt and shame and blame already, we don’t need to put more of it on ourselves.

Second, the fiction thing. I believe that there is nothing you can’t write about. I’m serious, too. I’m so over the moral panic over what people are reading and writing. I love torture porn horror movies. Saw 6 is one of my favorites, and it’s gorey and bloody and completely contradictory to the whole “save yourself by saving others and changing your ways” kinda message the other movies had. But I love it because it’s creative and gory and sometimes I just wanna be a little grossed out. I’ve read so much rape, molestation, genocide, torture, false imprisonment, racism, sexism, homophobia, anti-semitism, and murder in books. A few years back I read a book called The Ministry of Special Cases which was so disturbing I couldn’t sleep for two nights. And the really disturbing thing was that the book was a fictionalized way of bringing attention to shit that really happened in Argentina. None of the fiction I’ve been exposed to has turned me into a monster. None of the objectively terrible crap I’ve enjoyed in fiction has made me a bad person. That’s because it’s fiction and I knew right from wrong before I started reading the books and watching the movies. I know that murder and torture aren’t okay and if I really saw someone being murdered and/or tortured I would probably cry and throw up, but in fiction it’s fine.

Fiction exists for so many reasons. Sometimes it’s there to titillate, sometimes it’s to gross you out. Sometimes fiction is there to give you a world you might like to escape to and other times it’s to give you a world you’d want to escape from. Fiction is catharsis and hope and despair and repulsion and love and lies and death and rebirth. But, most importantly, it’s not real. Fiction is made up. Nothing is really happening here, other than the reader is sitting and moving their eyes across a page or staring at a screen. Can fiction affect people though? Sure! It absolutely can! But it’s not a case of monkey-see-monkey-do. Humans have critical thinking skills and we don’t just imitate what we see in fiction because we think it’s fun or hot. If you’ve ever seen a work of “romanticized noncon” or “romanticized incest” and you were grossed out or repulsed by it, you’ve proven my point for me. We don’t automatically see a thing that we know is bad and suddenly go “you know, maybe I’ve been wrong” because it hasn’t been painted in a bad light. Children, too, are a lot smarter than people seem to give them credit for. Children know the difference between fantasy and reality. Adults do too, unless they’re having mental issues and then that’s a separate issues I don’t want to get into here.

Now, I know it’s kind of uncomfortable for some people, but the fact of the matter is is that people have some kinks and fantasies that are taboo. Some people have rape fantasies, and you know what? That’s perfectly okay. There’s nothing wrong with having a rape fantasy. It does not make you a rapist or “damaged”. And some people would like to express those fantasies either in a safe and consensual way with a partner or with fiction. That’s 100% okay. The thing is, like I said before, when reading, the only thing that’s really happening is that the reader is moving their eyes across a page. No one is actually being raped. No one is actually a rapist. Can it trigger discomfort in some readers if the rape is romanticized? Yes. Can it trigger bad memories and panic attacks in some readers? Yes. Does that mean that that piece of fiction should not exist? No. It does not. Sorrynotsorry, the fiction can still exist and I think it should. It’s a separate issue, really, but I don’t think anyone should feel shame about having fantasies that are consensual (like consensual non-consent is). I don’t want people feeling damaged or gross. That helps no one.

And before this argument comes up, no pedophilia is not a kink. Pedophilia is a mental issue and if anyone is having thoughts about kids of attraction to kids (real kids) they should seek help. There is help available and it should be addressed. That’s as much as I’m willing to say on the topic, but again, if someone wants to depict that in fiction I support them, too.

Look, I get the disgust over heavy topics that are written as titillation. I really do understand it. But I don’t agree that it’s always retraumatization and self-harm. I don’t agree that it should be policed. I don’t agree that if you’re not writing it “the right way” you’re bad and not really a survivor. Seriously, fuck that. I can’t stand no-true-Scotsman’s and that’s what that is. If you don’t write or ship it the “right way” you’re not a survivor – fuck that. Every person is different. Every shipper is different. We all write things for different reasons and sometimes some ships are better suited to work through issues that might not even really be trauma but is still something that bothers the author. Just because someone isn’t a victim or survivor doesn’t mean they’re barred from writing The Bad Thing. I hate this reductionist way of thinking. It started as “you’re only allowed if you cope ship” then it was “you can only cope ship if you’re specifically affected by the issues you’re writing personally” and now it’s “nope! No cope shipping allowed”. Nope, screw all of that. You’re allowed to write it. You’re allowed to write whatever the fuck you want. Now, this is a separate issue, (again) but I also think we’re allowed to talk about The Bad Things in fic. I think we’re allowed to say “hey, this thing here? That’s rape if it were to happen in real life and rape isn’t okay.” or “this is abuse if it happened IRL” or “this is sexist and here’s why”. BUT I think it can be done without attacking the authors and making them defensive so that they won’t listen. There’s a way to discuss things with people if you think they’re not taking it seriously, but you know what? If their response is “yeah I know, I just don’t care” or “yeah, I know, that’s why I tagged it like I did” then your job is done. It’s over. Move on and do something else. (ALSO, TAGS ON A FIC ARE THERE BECAUSE THE AUTHOR KNOWS WHAT THEY’RE WRITING. IF IT’S LABELED “ABUSE” IT’S BECAUSE THE AUTHOR KNOWS THEY ARE DEPICTING ABUSE NO MATTER HOW IT’S WRITTEN IN THE NARRATIVE.)

Fandom is a really cool space because we can always have discussions about the implications of our works and how we come across with what we’re trying to say. So, you know, we can have actual fruitful discussions about what abuse is and what it looks like while also depicting it and all the complicated things that go along with being a abuse survivor (like still loving your abuser, thinking you deserved it, guilt, shame, reluctance to talk to others, fear ect.). We don’t have to make every work of fiction perfect or wonderful or an outright condemnation of The Bad Thing because sometimes we’re still working on it. Sometimes we just need to say something and throw it out there.

Lastly, the more I think about this, the more insulted I am. OP admitted that writing about their trauma was therapeutic but has now decided it’s wrong for others to do it. Which, you know… that’s just fucking cruel. No, it’s not appropriate to walk out into the middle of the street and scream about your abuse because you’re not really doing it in a way that everyone present has volunteered to be subjected to. That’s not okay. But putting something up on your personal blog on the internet, tagging it properly, or writing it and putting it on Ao3? That’s not the same thing. Tags exist as warnings and filters. Ao3 is a safe space for readers and writers. It allows writers to put their work up, no matter how many Bad Things it has in it, and it has an organized tag system that allows readers to know what they’re getting into. And I think that’s amazing! It’s wonderful to know what kind of themes and topics you’re about to deal with while reading. Ao3 allows people to decide whether or not they’re ready to engage with the topics present and that’s fantastic!

But you know, that can’t happen if we don’t write it. It may surprise some people, but reading something that deals with a person’s trauma can be cathartic. Again, trauma is complicated. Sometimes one of the brain’s defense mechanisms is to fetishize that which hurts us. Sometimes the brain goes “hey, that Bad Thing is scary but let’s make it not scary! Let’s handle it this way instead!” and that’s healthy. It’s a way of processing and recontextualizing so that we can start to work through it. Does everyone do this? No. Do some people? Yes. Is it okay? Yes. There’s nothing wrong with it. But the people who aren’t comfortable with writing their own trauma or haven’t reached that point yet might need fiction to do it with. If we’re not allowed to write it, the people who need to read it can’t do that. So you know, if there is just one trauma survivor reading a fic to cope and process that was written by a non-trauma survivor, I think that fic is more than worth it.

But I said I’d point out why the idea that I can’t share my trauma is so insidious, so I’ll address that now. It’s telling survivors to shut up. If I can’t talk about who hurt me and what happened in a way I’m comfortable, how can I ever really help myself? How can I heal if I’m not allowed to express myself? Yeah, I have a therapist and a support group but that’s not enough. I need to be acknowledged. Survivors need to be seen and by telling them that they’re not allowed to express themselves in a safe place (which is what fiction is) you’re effectively telling them to shut the hell up. The message is effectively, “no one cares what happened to you. You’re gross. Stop talking” and that’s so fucking gross and cruel and wrong. No! We let survivors speak!

I know plenty of people who the softer things don’t actually help. I’m one of them. Taking a bath doesn’t help me process my trauma. Baking doesn’t help. Jogging and mindfulness and drinking smoothies doesn’t help. I need to write about it. I need to express it and physically talking about it, physically saying “this happened to me”, is too difficult for me. I’m getting better, but a lot of that is thanks to writing and the community of darkfic writers who help me process, who listen to me, who are the shining light in the dark for me. I’ve been free of self-harm for a year this past October and you know what? I think a lot of that is because I’ve given myself permission to express my suffering. I no longer have to hurt myself because I can be seen and that’s so fucking liberating.

To the survivors out there who are uncomfortable with darkfic existing, I sympathize. I actually do. There are things in fiction that piss me off and squick me and make me mad. There are things I don’t like seeing. But, it’s not my issue. I can’t tell other people they’re not allowed to write it. I can wonder about their motives, but I can’t say for sure what those motives are b/c I don’t know them. I understand the discomfort. I understand the side-eyeing. I understand being disgusted. But I’m not going to tell them to stop because there’s a chance that writing it the way they’re writing it is saving their life. Bottom line is this: there is no way to know why every person writing what they’re writing is doing it. Are some doing it for titillation? Yes. Are some coping? Yes. Are some harming themselves? Yes. But it’s not up for me to say that everyone participating is doing the same thing and I damn well am not going to condemn a whole group or practice that I know can help just because it makes me feel weird. Have a little compassion and empathy. Try to understand that we’re all at different places in our journey in life, and that some people cope differently and that’s okay.

OP asks that you listen survivors and I have. I’ve got my own thoughts and opinions and so do friends of mine who are survivors. We disagree with the notion that darkfic shouldn’t exist. 

@unforth-ninawaters replied to your post “Maybe I shouldn’t be so jealous or petty but it bothers me that my…”

*hugs* I saw the other comments and replies to this…a certain type of manipulative abuser courts young, vulnerable or dependent people outside the family and treats them like gold. It shores them up in the public eye and in their own head it’s a way to hide from that niggling guilt that they done fucked up.

In these cases the ploy only works if they aren’t around the other person much. The more exposure the more the masquerade starts to wear off. I’ve seen this play out with my grandfather, FIL, and a friend in college. It’s not about you and is not your fault. He couldn’t care for you or treat you like you deserved because he’s incapable of that, just as he truly is incapable of It with the youth he’s mentoring. Because his kindness isn’t about them, it’s always about

Himself, and again – the longer they’re with him the more evident that will become. Hopefully they’ll have the tools to recognize the signs, cause I wouldn’t want them to be hurt, just as I wish you hadn’t been hurt.

*hugs* Thanks. I really do hope that something falls through and he doesn’t actually do mentoring or they recognize that he’s not fit for it. 

What’s always pissed me off, aside from the fact that he was out mentoring other kids instead of being a father was that he was always so much better and more inspiring to them than he was at home. I get why he does it I just wish he wouldn’t for a million reasons. I hate that he gets away with it and I hate that I can’t really do anything about it. He doesn’t listen and he doesn’t really seem to get it when he’s called on his behavior or he gets defensive and… yeah. He’s a pain in the ass. It’s not fair and it’s not okay but talking about it and having people who support me helps a lot. 

Hopefully something falls through and it doesn’t work out or they recognize he’s not fit for the job. 

You are totally validated at being angry over this. My ex was exactly the fucking same. Well he didn’t drink but like everyone thought the fucking world of him. He could charm anyone. Well unless they got to be a good friend of mine then he’d be nasty to them or try and turn me against them. What I’m saying is abusers are A+ at fooling people.

I hate that they’re so good at it. I hate that they’re able to fool people into thinking they’re good and wonderful people. It’s unfair and I hate that you went through it, too.

Maybe you could anonymously let the people he’s trying to mentor for know of his unwholesome behavior?

See, that would be an okay idea, but they’re not going to believe it. He’s a recovering alcoholic (he’s a dry drunk though, he was knocked out for a few months after an accident so he couldn’t drink instead of deciding to quit and work through the recovery process) so in their mind he’s a changed man. It doesn’t matter what I say, if it’s not currently happening and they can’t see it, they won’t care b/c he admits to being a “less than stellar father” in his words but he won’t go into details and he won’t admit it was his fault. They’re much more likely to believe their buddy than they are to believe me.

@samanddeaninpanties replied to your post “Maybe I shouldn’t be so jealous or petty but it bothers me that my…”

Who says he really cares? He might be doing it for his image. People eat that shit up.

Narcissistic people are generally really good at getting people they aren’t actively abusing to like them

Those are good points. I wouldn’t put it past him, seeing as how the people who wanted him to do it in the first place think the sun shines out of his ass. Everyone seems to think he’s amazing and it always pisses me off because this is the same man who used to get blackout drunk and verbally and mentally abuse us. He’s not the kind of man I’d want mentoring kids and it pisses me off that everyone thinks he’s a wonderful person but he’s not. He neglects everyone who *does* need him until he needs someone to rage at. He’s a self-centered dick but no one sees it and no one wants to believe it. And I hate all the asshats who fall for it and keep propping him up like he’s great. 

Fairy Godmothers Aren’t Real

pherryt:

Written for @rosemoonweaver Fic-o-Ween Writing Prompt Challenge (where i signed up through my main blog @dragonpressgraphics

Prompt #5 : All their life Character A hoped for a someone to take them away from their crappy life. They always hoped for a hero or maybe even a fairy godmother. Yeah! A fairy godmother would be great! That was until they actually got one…

Posted on AO3

Supernatural, Denny (Dean Winchester/Benny Lafitte) pre relationship

TAGS: Fairy Godmothers, John Winchester’s A+ Parenting,  Dean and Sam have a craptastic life, Angst, Happy Ending, john hits dean

Word Count 2989
Summary Dean’s mom always told him that Angels were watching over him. The way his life’s been going, he’s stopped believing that a looooong time ago. But it doesn’t stop him from wishing that Angels or Fairy Godmothers or something similar really existed and could solve his problems with the swish of a magic wand or the snap of their fingers.

But wishing doesn’t make it true.

So why is there a Fairy Godmother standing in front of him?

Excerpt:

Dean hated living at home.

They never had enough money for things they wanted to do,
much less food. The house was falling apart (Dad had never had much motivation
for anything after Mom had died. At least, not for anything worthwhile, like
being a Dad or even a responsible adult), and Dean wasn’t even allowed to have
friends over because while Dad couldn’t be bothered enough to keep the place –
well, if not in better repair, at least tidy
– he was too ashamed to let anyone see how far they’d fallen.

Neither Sam nor he ever knew if they’d have electricity or
heat and oh, that’s right, Dad drank.

Dean supposed it could be much, much worse.

That was cold comfort when he was sporting another bruise on
his cheek because of Dad. To get things straight, Sam and Dean’s father didn’t abuse them. No! He didn’t go out of his
way to hit his sons, or do real damage to them. He never even laid a hand on
Sam at all. Dean just…hadn’t…gotten out of the way fast enough when they’d been
arguing. That was it. No big deal. Dean could take it.

And if Dean fervently wished that angels or fairy godmothers
or just something were real so they
could magically make this shit life of his better, nobody had to know.

“Boy, what is that purple thing on your face?” Bobby nearly
growled at Dean when Dean showed up at the shop that day. He worked three jobs
with the hope that he could make enough money to move him and Sam outta their
house and away from Dad.

“Nothin’, Bobby. Just tripped, is all,” Dean countered.
“Whattya got for me today?”

“Continental, bay 2,” Bobby grunted, staring at Dean
suspiciously. Dean just gave him a wide old grin and got to work. And when, 5
hours later – because Bobby didn’t have enough work to keep him on the schedule
full time (gotta love big chain shops, squeezin’ out the little people) – Dean
clocked out, it was time to head out to Benny’s Gumbo Shack where he got a
similar reception.

“Cher, why is it every time I see you, your sporting another
shiner?” Benny leaned over the counter, the dull grey dishrag paused on the old
wood countertop.

“Just clumsy, I guess,” Dean muttered, ducking around the
counter and into the back, shucking off his thin jacket – inadequate against
the autumn cold – and hanging it up, snagging his apron.

Dean didn’t think Benny bought it, if that squinty eyed,
thoughtful look was any indication. But if Benny didn’t bring it up, Dean was
gonna operate as if he had. And if Dean daydreamed about big burly men with close-cropped
beards and light blue eyes while he worked – well, who could blame him with
that fine, distracting man that he liked to call a friend so often in his view?

Read the rest on AO3

Tagging:

@jdragon122  @dmsilvisart @destielonfire @trisscar368 @emani-writes @rosemoonweaver @madamelibrarian @casanddeanwinchester @deadlyangelkay @formidablepassion